21 Oct 2026Laser & CNC machines 406Brands 30Comparisons 1,268
PROCESSINGTALKlaser cutters, engravers & CNC routers
TrendingASCARVA 3S ▲GPro Vision Split MOPA 60W ▲Master 50W ▲S2 Pro 36WPM 60WPRONAX ForgeHydra 9 Gen2 38WSwiftSolis Duo 20W
  1. Processing Talk
  2. Compare
  3. Glacier 90W vs MP 100W

AtomStack Glacier 90W vs Cloudray MP 100W

What Glacier 90W does better (3) and where MP 100W wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AtomStack Glacier 90W
AtomStack · 2025Glacier 90W
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$2,450
Higher score
vs
Cloudray MP 100W
Cloudray · 2025MP 100W
9.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$6,500
9.7Power & cutting8.9
9.5Work area7.8
3.2Safety4.7
5.2Features & ease of use5.6

Why is Glacier 90W better than MP 100W?

  1. Work area (surface)6,400 cm² vs 400 cm²16×
  2. Work area width (X)800 mm vs 200 mm4×
  3. Work area depth (Y)800 mm vs 200 mm4×

Why is MP 100W better than Glacier 90W?

  1. Laser output power90 W vs 100 W+11%
Specifications

Side by side

AtomStack Glacier 90WAtomStack Glacier 90W≈ US$2,4509.5
Cloudray MP 100WCloudray MP 100W≈ US$6,5009.5
General
Laser sourcesBlue diode (≈455 nm)Fibre (1064 nm)
Motion systemGantry (XY rails)Galvo (scanning mirrors)
Two laser sourcesNoNo
MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse)—Yes
Wavelength—1,064 nm
Laser power
Laser output power90 W100 W
Work area
Work area800 × 800 mm200 × 200 mm
Work area width (X)800 mm200 mm
Work area depth (Y)800 mm200 mm
Work area (surface)6,400 cm²400 cm²
Speed & cutting
Max engraving / travel speed—15,000 mm/s
Safety
Enclosed (fully covered)NoNo
Flame / fire detectionNo—
Features
Air assistNo—
Built-in cameraNoNo
Autofocus / auto heightYesYes
Rotary attachment support—Yes
Touchscreen / control panelYes—
Offline engraving (no computer)Yes—
Water coolingYesYes
Connectivity & software
Connections—USB
USB—Yes
Compatible software—LightBurn
LightBurn compatible—Yes
Size & power
Weight31 kg—
Rated power consumption—600 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare