- Processing Talk
- Compare
- X1 40W vs Glacier 90W
Aliencell X1 40W vs AtomStack Glacier 90W
What X1 40W does better (4) and where Glacier 90W wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Power & cutting9.7
9.1Work area9.5
9.8Safety3.2
9.5Features & ease of use5.2
Why is X1 40W better than Glacier 90W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)Yes · Glacier 90W: No
- Air assistYes · Glacier 90W: No
- Built-in cameraYes · Glacier 90W: No
- Flame / fire detectionYes · Glacier 90W: No
Why is Glacier 90W better than X1 40W?
- Laser output power40 W vs 90 W2.2×
- Work area (surface)2,910 cm² vs 6,400 cm²2.2×
- Work area depth (Y)477 mm vs 800 mm+68%
- Work area width (X)610 mm vs 800 mm+31%
- Weight35 kg vs 31 kg+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | — | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 40 W | 90 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 610 × 477 mm | 800 × 800 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 610 mm | 800 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 477 mm | 800 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 2,910 cm² | 6,400 cm² |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.1 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | No |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | — |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | Yes | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | Yes |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| File formats | SVG, DXF, JPG, PNG, BMP | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 903 mm | — |
| Depth | 787 mm | — |
| Height | 213 mm | — |
| Weight | 35 kg | 31 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 350 W | — |
