- Processing Talk
- Compare
- SM 100W vs G6 Split MOPA 100W
Acmer SM 100W vs Gweike G6 Split MOPA 100W
What SM 100W does better (3) and where G6 Split MOPA 100W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Power & cutting8.9
4.9Speed4.9
5.1Work area3.0
4.7Safety4.7
5.6Features & ease of use5.6
Why is SM 100W better than G6 Split MOPA 100W?
- Work area (surface)225 cm² vs 121 cm²+86%
- Work area width (X)150 mm vs 110 mm+36%
- Work area depth (Y)150 mm vs 110 mm+36%
Why is G6 Split MOPA 100W better than SM 100W?
G6 Split MOPA 100W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | 110 × 110 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | 110 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | 110 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | 121 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.001 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, EZCAD2 |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Input voltage | — | 110–220 V |
Related comparisons
vs
Monport GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60WvsAcmer SM 100W
6.36.8
vs
Monport GPro Vision Split MOPA 50WvsAcmer SM 100W
7.06.8
vs
Gweike MCORE 400WvsAcmer SM 100W
5.66.8
vs
Acmer SM 100WvsCreality Falcon T1 MOPA 60W
6.87.6
vs
Monport GA MOPA 100WvsAcmer SM 100W
6.96.8
vs
Monport GT Split MOPA 200WvsAcmer SM 100W
6.46.8