- Processing Talk
- Compare
- G6 Split 50W vs F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
Gweike G6 Split 50W vs xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
What G6 Split 50W does better (1) and where F2 Ultra MOPA 60W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Power & cutting7.2
4.7Safety8.9
5.6Features & ease of use7.7
Why is G6 Split 50W better than F2 Ultra MOPA 60W?
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · F2 Ultra MOPA 60W: No
Why is F2 Ultra MOPA 60W better than G6 Split 50W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · G6 Split 50W: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · G6 Split 50W: Yes
- Laser output power50 W vs 60 W+20%
- Two laser sourcesNo · G6 Split 50W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | Yes |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | — | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 110 × 110 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 110 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 110 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 121 cm² | — |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.001 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Flame / fire detection | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn, EZCAD2 | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Input voltage | 110–220 V | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gweike G6 Split 50WvsAcmer SM 60W
6.06.1
vs
Gweike G6 Split 50WvsMonport GT Split MOPA 100W
6.05.9
vs
Gweike G6 Split 50WvsGweike G6 MOPA 50W
6.05.8
vs
OMTech MOPA Split 30WvsGweike G6 Split 50W
4.96.0
vs
xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60WvsCloudray MP 60W
9.79.0
vs
xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60WvsCloudray MP 100W
9.79.5