- Processing Talk
- Compare
- G6 MOPA 70W vs GT Split MOPA 100W
Gweike G6 MOPA 70W vs Monport GT Split MOPA 100W
What G6 MOPA 70W does better (1) and where GT Split MOPA 100W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Power & cutting8.9
4.9Speed4.9
8.4Precision3.6
3.0Work area5.1
4.7Safety4.7
5.6Features & ease of use5.6
Why is G6 MOPA 70W better than GT Split MOPA 100W?
- Positioning accuracy0.001 mm vs 0.01 mm10×
Why is GT Split MOPA 100W better than G6 MOPA 70W?
- Work area (surface)121 cm² vs 225 cm²+86%
- Laser output power70 W vs 100 W+43%
- Work area width (X)110 mm vs 150 mm+36%
- Work area depth (Y)110 mm vs 150 mm+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 70 W | 100 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 110 × 110 mm | 150 × 150 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 110 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 110 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 121 cm² | 225 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.001 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, EZCAD2 | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 34 kg |
| Input voltage | 110–220 V | — |
