- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Beamo 30W vs K40 45W
FLUX Beamo 30W vs OMTech K40 45W
What Beamo 30W does better (5) and where K40 45W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Beamo 30W better than K40 45W?
- Built-in cameraYes · K40 45W: No
- Work area (surface)630 cm² vs 600 cm²+5%
- Wi-FiYes · K40 45W: No
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 200 mm+50%
- Weight22 kg vs 30 kg+36%
Why is K40 45W better than Beamo 30W?
- Laser output power30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Work area depth (Y)210 mm vs 300 mm+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | CO2 (10.6 µm) | CO2 (10.6 µm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | — | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 30 W | 45 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 210 mm | 200 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 210 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 630 cm² | 600 cm² |
| Pass-through slot | — | No |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 305 mm/s | 300 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.02 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Built-in fume filter / purifier | — | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | — | Yes |
| Built-in camera | Yes | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | — | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | — |
| Water cooling | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet | USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | Beam Studio | LaserGRBL |
| File formats | JPG, PNG, SVG, DXF | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 810 mm |
| Depth | — | 500 mm |
| Height | — | 249 mm |
| Weight | 22 kg | 30 kg |
| Rated power consumption | — | 45 W |
