21 Oct 2026Laser & CNC machines 406Brands 30Comparisons 1,278
PROCESSINGTALKlaser cutters, engravers & CNC routers
TrendingASCARVA 3S ▲Pronto 35 60W ▲GPro Vision Split MOPA 60W ▲Master 50WS2 Pro 36WPM 60WPRONAX ForgeHydra 9 Gen2 38WSwift
  1. Processing Talk
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad 3 vs CL-4x4

Carbide 3D Nomad 3 vs FoxAlien CL-4x4

What Nomad 3 does better (0) and where CL-4x4 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Carbide 3D Nomad 3
Carbide 3D · 2020Nomad 3
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$2,800
vs
FoxAlien CL-4x4
FoxAlien · 2023CL-4x4
7.0Score
7 advantages≈ US$2,900
Higher score
2.7Power & cutting4.9
3.7Precision8.5
2.9Work area9.5
6.5Safety3.1
2.4Features & ease of use3.2

Why is Nomad 3 better than CL-4x4?

Nomad 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is CL-4x4 better than Nomad 3?

  1. Work area (surface)412 cm² vs 14,884 cm²36.1×
  2. Spindle power130 W vs 400 W3.1×
  3. Closed-loop motors / servosNo · Nomad 3: Yes
  4. Work area width (X)203 mm vs 1,220 mm6×
  5. Work area depth (Y)203 mm vs 1,220 mm6×
  6. Z travel76 mm vs 100 mm+32%
  7. Ball screwsNo · Nomad 3: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Carbide 3D Nomad 3Carbide 3D Nomad 3≈ US$2,8003.7
FoxAlien CL-4x4FoxAlien CL-4x4≈ US$2,9007.0
General
Motion systemGantry (XY rails)Gantry (XY rails)
Work area
Work area203 × 203 mm1220 × 1220 mm
Work area width (X)203 mm1,220 mm
Work area depth (Y)203 mm1,220 mm
Work area (surface)412 cm²14,884 cm²
Z travel76 mm100 mm
Precision
Closed-loop motors / servosNoYes
Linear railsYesYes
Ball screwsNoYes
Safety
Enclosed (fully covered)NoNo
Lid interlockYes—
Features
Touchscreen / control panel—Yes
Offline engraving (no computer)—Yes
Laser module option (CNC)NoNo
Automatic tool changerNoNo
Tool length / Z probeNoNo
Connectivity & software
Connections—USB
USB—Yes
Compatible softwareVectric VCarve—
CNC milling
Spindle power130 W400 W
Max spindle speed24,000 rpm—
ColletER11—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare