- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Nomad 3 vs Shapeoko 4
Carbide 3D Nomad 3 vs Carbide 3D Shapeoko 4
What Nomad 3 does better (0) and where Shapeoko 4 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Work area7.6
Why is Nomad 3 better than Shapeoko 4?
Nomad 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Shapeoko 4 better than Nomad 3?
- Work area (surface)412 cm² vs 1,971 cm²4.8×
- Z travel76 mm vs 102 mm+34%
- Work area width (X)203 mm vs 444 mm2.2×
- Work area depth (Y)203 mm vs 444 mm2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 203 × 203 mm | 444 × 444 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 203 mm | 444 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 203 mm | 444 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 412 cm² | 1,971 cm² |
| Z travel | 76 mm | 102 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Closed-loop motors / servos | No | — |
| Linear rails | Yes | — |
| Ball screws | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | — |
| Lid interlock | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Laser module option (CNC) | No | — |
| Automatic tool changer | No | — |
| Tool length / Z probe | No | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | Vectric VCarve | Vectric VCarve |
| CNC milling | ||
| Spindle power | 130 W | — |
| Max spindle speed | 24,000 rpm | — |
| Collet | ER11 | — |
