- Processing Talk
- Compare
- SM 50W vs MOPA 60W
Acmer SM 50W vs OMTech MOPA 60W
What SM 50W does better (1) and where MOPA 60W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is SM 50W better than MOPA 60W?
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · MOPA 60W: No
Why is MOPA 60W better than SM 50W?
- Laser output power50 W vs 60 W+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | 150 × 150 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | 225 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 4 (open beam) |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | EZCAD2 |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| File formats | — | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF, JPG, PLT, PNG, TIF |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 555 mm |
| Depth | — | 335 mm |
| Height | — | 720 mm |
| Weight | — | 28 kg |
| Rated power consumption | — | 60 W |
Related comparisons
vs
Monport GT Split 50WvsAcmer SM 50W
4.55.3
vs
Monport GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 30WvsAcmer SM 50W
4.85.3
vs
Monport GT Split Fiber 60WvsAcmer SM 50W
5.25.3
vs
Monport GM Pro Integrated 50WvsAcmer SM 50W
4.55.3
vs
Acmer SM 50WvsCreality Falcon T1 Fiber 20W
5.35.1
vs
OMTech Integrated 50WvsAcmer SM 50W
5.45.3