- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S2 4W vs Swift Mini
Acmer S2 4W vs AtomStack Swift Mini
What S2 4W does better (5) and where Swift Mini wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Power & cutting2.7
4.8Work area3.6
3.2Safety3.2
5.7Features & ease of use3.4
Why is S2 4W better than Swift Mini?
- Work area (surface)900 cm² vs 196 cm²4.6×
- Air assistYes · Swift Mini: No
- Laser output power4 W vs 3.5 W+14%
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 135 mm2.2×
- Work area depth (Y)300 mm vs 145 mm2.1×
Why is Swift Mini better than S2 4W?
Swift Mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 4 W | 3.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 135 × 145 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 145 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 196 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.06 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | — |
| Depth | 500 mm | — |
| Height | 195 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 2.6 kg |
