- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S1 3.5W vs C1 Mini 3W
Acmer S1 3.5W vs Sculpfun C1 Mini 3W
What S1 3.5W does better (1) and where C1 Mini 3W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Power & cutting2.5
9.4Precision9.4
2.9Work area3.5
3.2Safety3.2
2.4Features & ease of use2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1 3.5WC1 Mini 3W
| S1 3.5W | C1 Mini 3W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 140 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 250 mm | 290 mm | −40 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm | = |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.1 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1 3.5W better than C1 Mini 3W?
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 3 W+17%
Why is C1 Mini 3W better than S1 3.5W?
- Work area (surface)169 cm² vs 195 cm²+15%
- Weight1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg+36%
- Work area width (X)130 mm vs 150 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 130 × 130 mm | 150 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 130 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 169 cm² | 195 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.04 mm | 0.04 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | — | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 250 mm | 290 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 140 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.1 kg |
