- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S1 3.5W vs S2 4W
Acmer S1 3.5W vs Acmer S2 4W
What S1 3.5W does better (1) and where S2 4W wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1 3.5WS2 4W
| S1 3.5W | S2 4W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 195 mm | −33 mm |
| Width | 250 mm | 490 mm | −240 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 500 mm | −250 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1 3.5W better than S2 4W?
- Laser spot size0.04 mm vs 0.06 mm+50%
Why is S2 4W better than S1 3.5W?
- Work area (surface)169 cm² vs 900 cm²5.3×
- Air assistNo · S1 3.5W: Yes
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 4 W+14%
- Work area width (X)130 mm vs 300 mm2.3×
- Work area depth (Y)130 mm vs 300 mm2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 4 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 130 × 130 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 130 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 130 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 169 cm² | 900 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | 167 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.04 mm | 0.06 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | — | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 250 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 500 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 195 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | — |
