- Processing Talk
- Compare
- K1 3.5W vs LM2 S2 1.6W
Acmer K1 3.5W vs Ortur LM2 S2 1.6W
What K1 3.5W does better (2) and where LM2 S2 1.6W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Power & cutting3.5
9.6Safety4.9
2.9Features & ease of use2.7
Why is K1 3.5W better than LM2 S2 1.6W?
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 1.6 W2.2×
- Enclosed (fully covered)Yes · LM2 S2 1.6W: No
Why is LM2 S2 1.6W better than K1 3.5W?
LM2 S2 1.6W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 1.6 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | — | 12 mm |
| Max cutting depth – acrylic | — | 5 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.04 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 286 mm | — |
| Depth | 273 mm | — |
| Height | 190 mm | — |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | — |
