- Processing Talk
- Compare
- K1 3.5W vs Pixi Red 5W
Acmer K1 3.5W vs Algolaser Pixi Red 5W
What K1 3.5W does better (0) and where Pixi Red 5W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Power & cutting3.2
Why is K1 3.5W better than Pixi Red 5W?
K1 3.5W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Pixi Red 5W better than K1 3.5W?
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 5 W+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.04 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | — |
| Flame / fire detection | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | — |
| Built-in camera | No | — |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 286 mm | — |
| Depth | 273 mm | — |
| Height | 190 mm | — |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | — |
